Glass Filled PTFE (most people just say Teflon (R)). it is an inexpensive seal face and ideal for fresh water applications. Ni-resist - Is a form of Stainless steel which has had nickel added to it to lower the friction generated by the rotating face. Tungsten carbide also can be re-lapped and polished to be re-used. Ideal for high pressure applications due to a high modulus of elasticity which helps prevent face distortion. It is very hard like silicon carbide however it is very heavy to the touch, making it easy to distinguish from silicon carbide. Tungsten Carbide - A very versatile seal face like Silicon Carbide. Either grade of SIC can usually be re-lapped and polished to be reused.
#Mindustry mechanical pump free
Alpha Sintered Silicon carbide does however sacrifice the Pressure Velocity ratios due to the lack of un-reacted free carbon. In Chemical applications however, Alpha Sintered Silicon Carbide may be recommended. The most common is reaction-bonded silicon carbide. It is in the same family as Ceramic (due to the Silica), but has much better lubrication qualities and is harder. Silicon Carbide - Is a bluish-black material created by fusing silica and coke. They will also shatter like a plate if dropped on concrete. Ceramic cannot however handle the thermal shocks that Ni-resist or 17-4 seats can. It is chemically inert and can be applied to nearly any product. In contrast, if a Silicon Carbide or Tungsten Carbide seal face is worn, it can generally be re-lapped and polished, bringing it back to "like new" condition and allowing a second, third or even fourth use of the same seal head.Ĭeramic - Generally a 99.5% aluminum oxide offering excellent wear characteristics due to it's hardness. We have found the coating will always eventually wear and once it has will need to be completely recoated. They have been sold by various trade names by the major mechanical seal companies but in our opinion are not worth the money. The coatings are "plasma coatings" and are generally a form or silicon or tungsten carbide sprayed onto a stainless steel seal head. Another group of seal faces would be those of coated seal faces. If using an airblast would provide better ore tile coverage than a bunch of laser drills would, you go for airblasts where it's good, and laser drills on the sparser patches.The most common types of seal faces are: Carbon, Ceramic, Ni-resist, 17-4, Silicon Carbide, Tungsten Carbide, GFPTFE (glass filled PTFE. But if there's no water and you have to rely on water extraction, then logic gets a lot messier. If there's water nearby, always go for lasers because pumping water either doesn't cost much energy or even is free in the case of mechanical pumps (you only need 1 mechanical pump per laser drill). Most situations you cannot go wrong with using a Laser drill over an airblast. Lasers are more power efficient than airblast on the whole even though both mine at the same speed per tile.
#Mindustry mechanical pump full
After this the strategies part ways and go full defense or offense or maybe even a mix of the 2. Setup a core leeching 6-8 silicon core leeching factory. So what is the conclusion I can draw from this? Thorium (More than half of the ranked maps have 100-300 metaglass in the loadout for watex/pumps, 2 titanium lines of sand. The units at the top of the table are incorrect ( *They should be power*tile/sec instead of power/sec)Įven though airblasts+water extract is more power efficient than 2 laser + 2 water extractor setups, the values still aren't bad and are in fact super close to the airblasts when reaching 16 tiles! I decided to table out power cost per tile of each setup depending on ore coverage here. Lasers being slightly less power efficient. HOWEVER if we include water extractors, we get this. If an airblast is on only 9 tiles, it's using -20 energy/sec per tile! This is 170% more power than a laser drill would use! The number gets worse if there are gaps under the drills. The correct value is 7.33 instead of 8.2). 11.25 per tile vs -7.33 per tile ( *graphic was wrong. This means that an Airblast on 9 tiles of ore will output exactly the same amount of ore a Laser would have in the same given time periodĪirblasts use more energy than Lasers do. This was made in a response to a discussion another thread, but I think it could use better visibility here since this doesn't seem to be common knowledge yet.Īirblasts mine exactly the same rate as a laser drills per tile covered.
0 kommentar(er)
